Because the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is arrived at, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

How much sway case legislation holds may possibly fluctuate by jurisdiction, and by the exact circumstances in the current case. To examine this concept, look at the following case regulation definition.

As being the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been attained, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.

Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may well seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice on the Peace u/s 22-A is not really obliged to afford a possibility of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors. Read more

In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there may possibly exist conflicts between the assorted lower appellate courts. Sometimes these differences may not be resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the law is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, it is also a nicely-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.

Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, helping you in understanding the intricacies of land and property legislation.

Under Article uk case law 199, the court possesses the authority to review government policies for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. For that reason, this petition is admissible based on established court precedents, plus the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more

If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability in the matter, but could not be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request on the appellate court.

Because of their position between the two main systems of regulation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as blended systems of regulation.

States also usually have courts that deal with only a specific subset of legal matters, for example family legislation and probate. Case regulation, also known as precedent or common regulation, is definitely the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending around the relationship between the deciding court and also the precedent, case law could be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for your Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting in California (whether a federal or state court) just isn't strictly bound to Stick to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by just one district court in The big apple is just not binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning could help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions because of the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more